The United States began pulling spies out of Beijing in
response to a cyber attack launched on the United States database exposing data
of approximately 21.5 million government workers. The United States firmly believes China is
responsible for the breach in security which consequently disclosed 5.6 million
government employee fingerprints. The information that China allegedly stole
can be deduced to discover which government employees are spies, and as a
result, endangering numerous lives.
The information stolen not only identifies embassy personal
who are actually intelligence agents’, but also future agents’ identities. This breach threatens the lives of the current
spies as well as compromises future opportunities to gather Intel on potential
actions of the Chinese government. This
places the United States in a difficult position as the country will no longer
have the advantage it once had. The
United States cannot send the same agents back to Beijing, as their identities
have been exposed; therefore, the country will have to refigure their plan to
learn potential actions China may pursue. This grave accident has exemplified
the importance of maintaining proper security for such critical information.
Approximately 5.6 million government employee fingerprints
were exposed. Numerous areas of information were exposed in the breach of 21.5
million employees, such as Social Security numbers, addresses, phone numbers,
passwords and more. What makes the 5.6 million bio-metric exposures a higher
concern is that finger prints are permanent. They cannot be replaced like
Social Security numbers or passwords, they are forever. As a result, this will
potentially generate repercussions for years. It is said that, “(The)
interagency working group including experts from law enforcement and the
intelligence community will review ways that the fingerprint data could be
abused and try to develop ways to prevent that from happening.” I find it odd
that the government was not more careful with 21.5 million fingerprints.
The attack was allegedly launched by the Chinese in Beijing.
Even though the speaker for Chinese Foreign affairs, Hong Lei, denied the
attack, numerous people speculate the Chinese are establishing a database on
Americans. The United States has not
placed public blame on China, as Lei stated they have “The Chinese government
firmly opposes any forms of hacking.” There is no evidence to accuse China for
the cyber attack.
These articles demonstrate the importance of security with
data and information with the progression of technology. The article does not
explain why the government officials unofficially blame China. If the
government did not believe it was China, then why did the U.S pull undercover
intelligence agents from that nation? It also does not explain how the hackers
accessed the information, whether they bypassed passwords, or went through a
firewall. With the progression of
technology, databases become easier to manage and store information, which
makes databases, arguably, more valuable. Security measures for databases,
especially government databases, require precise attention and without it, will
potentially cause serious repercussions for the future.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2015/09/23/opm-now-says-more-than-five-million-fingerprints-compromised-in-breaches/
No comments:
Post a Comment